19.8 C
London
Tuesday, July 29, 2025

EU-US commerce deal: The largest losers and (just a few) winners

PoliticsEU-US commerce deal: The largest losers and (just a few) winners

The commerce deal struck by U.S. President Donald Trump and European Fee President Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday at his Scottish golf resort was massively one-sided.

The European Union faces the ache of 15 % U.S. tariffs on most of its exports — and the bloc has needed to make telephone-number-sized monetary commitments each to import power from the USA and to speculate there.

Nonetheless, from the highly effective German auto business to the European aviation and semiconductor sectors, there are some winners from the define accord — which has but to be finalized in writing.

POLITICO’s reporting workforce breaks down what we all know thus far:

Power Autos Aviation Prescription drugs Know-how Digital regulation Protection Metal Food and drinks Funding

Power

What’s within the deal? As a part of the settlement,Trump and von der Leyen agreed that the EU would buy $750 billion of oil and liquefied pure fuel from the U.S. — a determine that may additionally embrace different power merchandise comparable to nuclear gasoline. Meaning $250 billion in new power purchases annually, which the Fee chief mentioned would additionally assist finish the EU’s remaining reliance on Russian imports.

Who wins, who loses? In concept, the deal is a large win for U.S. oil and fuel corporations. In observe, consultants say it’s unworkable. For starters, hitting that focus on would require the EU to triple its U.S. power imports, based mostly on final yr’s figures, whereas asking American corporations to divert all their power flows worldwide towards the bloc — after which some. Compared, Russia’s whole power gross sales to the EU totaled simply €23 billion final yr. Brussels additionally has restricted instruments to make that every one occur: Imports are firmly within the fingers of personal corporations.

By Victor Jack

again to the highest

Autos

What’s within the deal? U.S. tariffs on vehicles and auto elements are being diminished to the baseline 15 % — a stage that matches the deal notched earlier this month by Japanese automakers. In alternate, the EU has agreed to decrease its automobile tariffs from 10 % to zero, commerce spokesperson Olof Gill mentioned. The satan is within the particulars, nonetheless, which stay sparse. Underneath the U.S.-Japan deal, the Asian nation will take autos permitted to U.S. automotive requirements. A senior Fee official mentioned the EU deal contains “a dedication to work collectively … to see the place requirements are already aligned or the place we have to work extra intently to align them sooner or later.” As POLITICO scooped, the chief beforehand floated the thought of matching U.S. autonomous driving requirements, which was talked about in Monday’s technical briefing as a chance.
Who wins, who loses? In response to the German automobile foyer, this can be a unhealthy deal that may proceed to burden the sector. It joined the American auto sector in decrying tariffs on vehicles and elements produced in Mexico, which stay on the larger 25 %. The actual loser isn’t the automakers, although, however their staff, in keeping with Ferdinand Dudenhöffer, the director of Germany’s Middle Automotive Analysis. He estimates that as much as 70,000 jobs throughout European automobile corporations and their suppliers might be misplaced as automakers transfer manufacturing to the U.S. to skirt the 15 % tariff.

By Jordyn Dahl

again to the highest

Aviation

What’s within the deal? The EU-U.S. zero-for-zero tariffs deal on “all plane and element elements,” introduced by von der Leyen, permits each aircraft makers and airways to breathe a sigh of aid. The worldwide provide chain that lies behind each plane makes this sector extra susceptible to commerce limitations than others. Following the 17-year dispute between Airbus and Boeing that concluded in 2021, neither the European nor the American industries had been excited by getting into a brand new commerce conflict involving aviation.

Who wins, who loses? Though Boeing could have benefited from tariffs on its competitor Airbus within the brief time period, analysts notice that the U.S. plane producer would undergo extra beneath EU retaliation. As an alternative, some U.S. airways working an Airbus fleet, comparable to Delta Air Strains and Spirit Airways, would have instantly felt the influence of tariffs on their European suppliers. Among the many losers of the zero-for-zero tariff are leasing corporations on each side of the Atlantic, which — if tit-for-tat tariffs had been launched — would have been the instrument utilized by airways to keep away from the additional costs.

By Tommaso Lecca

again to the highest

Prescription drugs

What’s within the deal? Trump and von der Leyen flatly contradicted one another on Sunday, with the U.S. president saying the commerce deal didn’t embrace prescribed drugs — and the Fee chief saying it did. Fee officers clarified on Monday that the speed stays at zero for now. However Brussels is anticipating a prime tariff fee of 15 % to take impact as soon as the U.S. administration’s Part 232 investigation into the sector — beneath which tariffs could be imposed for causes of nationwide safety — is full. There are some exemptions for “sure generics,” von der Leyen mentioned, though it’s not clear but which.

Who wins, who loses? Generics corporations — those who make the most cost effective medicine of all — say they’ve probably the most to lose due to their small margins, even when the eventual tariff fee is considerably decrease than the 200 % Trump had threatened just a few weeks in the past. Trade affiliation Medicines for Europe needs extra readability on which medicine would see zero tariffs utilized, and is pushing the EU and the U.S. to “develop the tariff-free listing of medicines as broadly as potential.” Pharma firm Merck mentioned it welcomed the truth that a deal has at the least been made, whereas in Eire — which is especially uncovered due to its large pharma sector — enterprise affiliation Ibec mentioned Europe had “capitulated.”

By Mari Eccles

again to the highest

Know-how

What’s within the deal? Sunday’s deal included chip tools as one of many sectors that obtained a zero-for-zero tariff, which means it’s exempt from the baseline 15 % tariff. Von der Leyen underlined that the EU is and would stay a distinguished purchaser of American synthetic intelligence chips. “U.S. AI chips will assist energy our AI gigafactories and assist the U.S. to keep up their technological edge,” she mentioned.

Who wins, who loses? The zero-for-zero tariff was broadly seen as a win for Dutch chip printing machine maker ASML, one among Europe’s largest corporations by market capitalization. The machines that ASML ships are price lots of of hundreds of thousands of euros apiece. ASML didn’t decide to development this yr in mid-July amid the tariff uncertainty, however its inventory gained 4 % on Monday. Von der Leyen’s dedication to purchase U.S. AI chips is a setback, although, for proponents of a extra technologically sovereign Europe — since persevering with to purchase them prolongs the bloc’s reliance on U.S. tech.

By Pieter Haeck

again to the highest

Digital Regulation

What’s within the deal? Nothing. The Fee referred to as the Trump administration’s bluff on its try and bend the EU’s guidelines — and in the intervening time it has paid off. “There’s completely no dedication on digital regulation, nor on digital taxes,” mentioned a senior EU official, including that the Fee’s protection of the bloc’s regulator autonomy hadn’t obtained sufficient consideration.

Who wins, who loses? The EU’s digital rulebook — and particularly the Digital Markets Act and the Digital Companies Act — has emerged unscathed. That wasn’t for an absence of strain on the U.S. aspect, with Large Tech gamers like Meta and Apple turning into more and more outspoken over the DMA. They’re maintaining the strain — the Pc & Communications Trade Affiliation tech foyer group has simply printed a research that pegged the fee and misplaced revenues of the EU’s digital guidelines at $97.6 billion yearly, together with roughly $1 billion in DMA compliance prices alone.

By Jacob Parry

again to the highest

Protection

What’s within the deal? Trump touted the acquisition of “huge quantities” of U.S. army tools — however senior EU officers pushed again, stressing that arms procurement was not negotiated as a part of the settlement. “Arms procurement isn’t a matter for the Fee,” one official mentioned, including it “was not calculated in any method into the figures we talked about.” Briefly: There isn’t any formal dedication to purchase U.S. weapons.

Who wins, who loses? The U.S. protection business didn’t rating a assured win — however it might nonetheless profit. EU officers acknowledged that Europe’s rising army budgets may favor American corporations. “On the again of the NATO summit in The Hague, there may be, after all, an understanding that our member states, with the Fee’s very lively assist, are rising protection spending, and subsequently that may immediately or not directly profit the USA,” one official mentioned. That dynamic may depart European protection corporations uneasy as procurement choices ramp up.

By Chris Lunday

again to the highest

Metal

What’s within the deal? Apparently, a return to quotas that sound fairly much like those beneath the Biden administration. Above that, the 50 % tariff would (more than likely) stay in place. An EU official mentioned on Monday that the extent of the quotas themselves has not but been negotiated. This can want extra time than is obtainable earlier than Aug. 1. On prime of that, the U.S. considerably acknowledges that the EU isn’t the issue in terms of world extra manufacturing of metal and aluminum. Brussels and Washington will focus on a “ring fence” to isolate themselves from that unfairly made metal from China, Indonesia, Egypt, Turkey and a number of others.

Who wins, who loses? If the European metal business can — at the least to some extent — maintain sending specialised merchandise to the U.S., it can desire that over a blanket 50 % tariff. The actual loser right here is perhaps China, nonetheless. If the united statesand EU certainly handle to construct a metal wall round their markets — which might be an enormous if contemplating the U.S. lack of emissions buying and selling — the Chinese language technique would possibly truly see some severe counterweight.

By Koen Verhelst

again to the highest

Food and drinks

What’s within the deal? Sure agricultural merchandise may take pleasure in a zero-to-zero tariff relationship with the U.S., von der Leyen instructed reporters, however the Fee president didn’t specify which items these could be.The most recent, from a senior Fee official, is that the EU will decrease tariffs on what they think about “non-sensitive” agricultural items from the USA, whereas “delicate” agricultural imports will proceed to face the present charges.

Who wins, who loses? It’s too early to say. Hints are that U.S. nuts, pet meals and bison may face simpler entry into EU markets as “non-sensitive” agricultural items, whereas U.S. beef — thought of “delicate” — will proceed to face tariffs. Nonetheless, negotiators are nonetheless negotiating over zero-to-zero tariffs and figuring out the position of key agri-food items, together with spirits and wine, throughout the general deal agreed by the leaders.

By Lucia Mackenzie

again to the highest

Funding

What’s within the deal? A dedication by EU corporations to speculate an extra $600 billion within the U.S. Removed from a serious concession to Trump, the pledge seems to quantity to little greater than window dressing. “It’s largely performative,” mentioned Nils Redeker from the Jacques Delors Centre assume tank. Brussels, the truth is, received’t have the facility to ship on this promise, because the investments would come completely from the non-public sector, two senior Fee officers mentioned. One mentioned the determine was “based mostly on detailed discussions with totally different enterprise associations and corporations with a view to see what their funding intentions are.”

Who wins, who loses? Further investments from Europe are more likely to increase the U.S. financial system. Nonetheless, it’s too early to say whether or not this extra funding will come on the expense of investments inside Europe, which might dent EU development.

By Gregorio Sorgi

Check out our other content

Most Popular Articles