Lucy Connolly has mentioned she is contemplating to take authorized motion towards the police simply sooner or later after being launched from jail.
The 42-year-old – who was jailed over a social media publish after the Southport assault – mentioned she believes the police had been "dishonest" in what they mentioned about her.
Discussing taking authorized motion, Mrs Connolly, who left HMP Peterborough on Thursday morning, mentioned: “That’s one thing that I shall be wanting into.
"I don’t wish to say an excessive amount of as a result of I would like to hunt authorized recommendation on that, however I do assume the police had been dishonest in what they launched and what they mentioned about me, and I shall be holding them to account for that," she advised The Telegraph.
She mentioned she is is contemplating taking authorized motion over an announcement which advised she advised officers in her police interview she didn’t like immigrants, claiming her phrases had been "massively twisted and used towards me”.
A press launch from the CPS following her responsible plea on September 2 included a quote from Frank Ferguson, head of the Crown Prosecution Service’s Particular Crime and Counter Terrorism Unit, which mentioned: “Throughout police interview Lucy Connolly said she had sturdy views on immigration, advised officers she didn’t like immigrants and claimed that youngsters weren’t protected from them.”
Mrs Connolly additionally confirmed that she is because of meet with the Donald Trump administration over a "free speech crackdown".
Talking about her assembly with Trump representatives, she mentioned: “They’re very taken with the way in which issues are going within the UK and so they’re clearly advocates free of charge speech.
“Their legal professionals are eager to talk with me,” she advised Dan Wootton’s podcast.
The case of Mrs Connolly has been beforehand been raised within the White Home following a landmark GB Information interview.
Her imprisonment was raised with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a unprecedented diplomatic growth.
It got here after American political commentator and activist Charlie Kirk pledged to take Connolly's case proper to the highest of the Trump administration.
The previous childminder, who’s the spouse of a Conservative councillor, mentioned she considers herself Sir Keir Starmer's "political prisoner".
"I believe with Starmer he must apply what he preaches, she advised The Telegraph.
"He’s a human rights lawyer, so possibly he wants to take a look at what folks’s human rights are; what freedom of speech means; and what the legal guidelines are on this nation.”
She was handed a 31-month sentence after she posted on X: “Mass deportation now, set hearth to all of the f****** inns stuffed with the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it.”
Although she has now mentioned she "ought to by no means" have made the remark, she insisted she was "no far-right thug".
“You’re shutting folks’s voices down. It’s ‘let’s give them a label’. Let’s inform them they’re dangerous folks after which they are going to be quiet," she mentioned on Dan Wootton’s Outspoken YouTube present.
Mrs Connolly, from Northampton, pleaded responsible to inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing “threatening or abusive” written materials on X and was jailed at Birmingham Crown Courtroom in October final 12 months.
She was ordered to serve 40 per cent of her sentence in jail earlier than being launched on licence.
Mrs Connolly was arrested on August 6, by which level she had deleted her social media account, however different messages which included additional racist remarks had been uncovered by officers who seized her telephone.
Her case has sparked debate, with some criticising her sentence as extreme.
Reacting to her launch, Conservative chief Kemi Badenoch mentioned Mrs Connolly’s sentence was “harsher than the sentences handed down for bricks thrown at police or precise rioting”.
Reform UK chief Nigel Farage described the case as a “image of Keir Starmer’s authoritarian, damaged, two-tier Britain”.
A bid to problem her sentence on the Courtroom of Enchantment was dismissed in Might, which was described by Mr Connolly as “stunning and unfair”.